Published on December 20, 2017

The tables below show the effects of the Conference Committee tax legislation across various family types and income groups. The conference legislation reconciles the previously passed House legislation and Senate legislation. Tables are prepared using the official score provided by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) for fiscal year 2019. Choose a family type and income quintile to learn more!

Methodology

This document describes the methodology of the USAFacts tax reform cohort tables available here and here. For a general methodology of USAFacts cohort tables, click here.

We begin with the official revenue score of each tax provision provided by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) for fiscal year 2019. Each JCT revenue category amount is allocated to each family economic unit in our microdata set using an allocator. Most of the allocators are created using a tax calculator that simulates the change in tax liability for each provision for each of the records in the microdata set. Specifically, the calculator first calculates tax liability under current law and then incrementally adds each major provision to get the tax change from that provision. The order is identical to the order presented for major provisions by JCT in its revenue score with the exception of AMT repeal, which is the second provision. (This is based on correspondence with the committee.) We use tax year 2019 law in the calculator as the allocators for the fiscal year 2019 JCT scores.

The provisions and their allocators for the Conference bill are as follows along with their fiscal year 2019 JCT-estimated amount:

Rate and bracket changes (-$135.3 billion)

The Conference bill would maintain seven brackets, albeit with lower rates for most taxable income brackets. The current rates of 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6% would change to 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37%. Some bracket thresholds would change relative to current law as well. For example, the top bracket would not begin for married couples until $600,000, which is higher than the current threshold. The tax calculator simulates new tax liabilities under these new rates and brackets and then subtracts this new tax liability from the current law liability. This difference in simulated tax liability of current law versus post-rate and bracket changes for each record in the microdata is used to allocate the JCT total for rate and bracket changes in the Conference bill.

Reduction in alternative minimum tax (-$82.5 billion)

The Conference bill would reduce the burden of the alternative minimum tax (AMT) by increasing the exemption amounts and exemption phaseout thresholds relative to current law. The tax calculator simulates liabilities after the increased exemption and phaseout thresholds and then compares the liability to the liability calculated after the previous stage (the rate and bracket changes). This difference in simulated tax liability for each record in the microdata is used to allocate the JCT total for AMT changes in the Conference bill.

Modify standard deduction (-$82.6 billion)

The Conference bill would increase the standard deduction, nearly double their current values. The tax calculator simulates new tax liabilities with the modified standard deduction in addition to the rate and bracket changes and changes in AMT. The calculator assumes that all tax returns choose the greater of itemized deductions or standard deduction. This provision would thereby lead to many tax returns moving from itemizing to taking the standard deduction. The difference between the simulated tax liability before and after the standard deduction modifications is used to allocate the JCT total for the standard deduction modifications in the Conference bill.

Repeal of personal exemptions (+$137.1 billion)

The Conference bill would repeal the use of personal exemptions, which currently reduces taxable income by $4,050 per person claimed on a tax return (primary, spouse, and dependents). This provision would thereby increase the amount of income that is subject to taxation. Currently, high-income taxpayers are phased out from personal exemptions, which means that this provision does not affect high-income tax returns as much as middle-income returns. The difference between the simulated tax liability before and after the personal exemption repeal is used to allocate the JCT total for the personal exemption repeal in the Conference bill.

Alternative inflation measure (+$2.1 billion)

The Conference bill would change the inflation metric that is used to annually adjust various tax parameter such as tax brackets and the standard deduction. Using chained CPI as proposed would likely lead to smaller inflation adjustments, and thereby gradually higher tax liabilities relative to what would exist under the current inflation metric (CPI-U). It should be noted that this provision has a very small effect in the initial years but a larger effect in latter years due to compounding. The difference between the simulated tax liability before and after the inflation metric change is used to allocate the JCT total for the inflation metric change. In the USAFacts cohort tables, this item is included with other tax changes in the Conference bill.

Change in Tax Treatment of Individuals’ Business Income (-$35.9 billion)

The Conference bill would enact a 20% deduction for pass-through business income (defined as S-corp, partnership, and sole proprietor income) and would put limits on the usage of this tax preference, especially by high-income taxpayers. These restrictions are put in place for certain businesses involved in the service sectors and for those with low wages paid to employees. These restrictions are put in place only for those beyond certain taxable income thresholds. The Conference bill also contains a provision that would disallow the deduction of losses in excess of $500,000 on active pass-through income ($250,000 for single returns). The difference between the simulated tax liability before and after the new special business deduction is used to allocate the JCT total for the proposed special deduction for qualified business income.

Modification of child tax credit (-$67.7 billion)

The Conference bill would increase the nonrefundable portion of the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000, create a new $500 tax credit for non-child dependents, and allow for up to $1,400 of the child tax credit to be refundable. It would also increase the phase-out thresholds to $200,000 for married couples and $400,000 for single returns from the current $75,000 (single)/$110,000 (married). The difference between the simulated tax liability before and after the child tax credit modifications is used to allocate the JCT total for the proposed child tax credit changes.

Reform of itemized deductions (+$69.0 billion)

The Conference bill would repeal all itemized deductions with the exception of deductions for charity, mortgage interest, state and local taxes paid (less than $10,000), and medical expenses. In addition, the bill would repeal the limitation on itemized deductions (i.e., the so-called Pease provision) currently in place for high-income taxpayers. Finally, the bill would decrease the AGI threshold for the itemized deduction for medical and dental expenses from 10% to 7.5% in the initial year. The biggest change in this category is the $10,000 cap on the deductibility of state and local taxes paid. The difference between the simulated tax liability before after the reform of itemized deductions is used to allocate the JCT total for the itemized deductions category.

Other individual tax changes (+$4.1 billion)

The Conference bill contains some other relatively small tax changes that would affect individual income tax collections. These include the following with FY 2019 values:

Require SSN for child tax credit ($3.9 billion) – allocated by the amount of child tax credit claimed

Repeal charitable deduction for amounts paid in exchange for college athletic event seating rights ($0.2 billion) – allocated based on benefit from charitable deduction

Repeal exclusion for employer-provided qualified moving expense reimbursements and repeal deduction for moving expenses ($1.4 billion) – allocated based on taxable wages

Repeal of deduction for alimony payments and generally corresponding inclusion in income ($0.1 billion) – allocated based on alimony adjustment claimed

Note: the inflation adjustment is also included in this category in the cohort tables.

Estate and gift tax reduction (-$8.1 billion)

The Conference bill would reduce estate and gift by doubling the exemption. Estate tax changes are allocated using a simulated estate tax variable that is calculated using estimated wealth for each family. The estate tax changes are virtually all allocated to the top income groups.

Business tax reforms (-$91.2 billion)

The Conference bill would enact many reforms of business taxation, including most notably a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and a reform of international taxation. The combined JCT total of business tax reforms and international tax reforms is allocated to family economic units on the basis of both their share of labor income and capital income. We allocate 50% of this category on the basis of labor income and 50% on the basis of capital income.

Comparisons to other organizations

These cohort tables are similar but may differ slightly from distributional tables put forth by other organizations such as the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), Tax Policy Center, Tax Foundation, Citizens for Tax Justice, etc. for a variety of reasons, including unit of analysis, income measures that organize the tax units, which federal taxes are included, tax incidence assumptions, extrapolation assumptions, and other methodological differences.

Total Income Definition

In these tables, total income is measured as the sum of average wages and salaries, average supplements to wages and salaries, average self-employment income, average interest income, average rental income, average s-corp income, average dividend income, average capital gains income, average net retirement income, average other market income, and all government income minus refundable tax credits.

Affordable Care Act

We exclude the effect of the removal of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate provision, which is included in the Conference bill. Our choice to exclude the repeal of the ACA provision is in line with the Congressional Budget Office’s methodology which states that “excluding the effects of the individual mandate penalty removes from this distributional analysis the effects on revenues and outlays related to premium tax credits as well as changes in spending for Medicaid, cost-sharing reduction payments, the Basic Health Program, and Medicare.”

Explore more of USAFacts

Related Articles

View All

Newsletter

Data delivered to your inbox

Keep up with the latest data and most popular content.